The people who start smoking at an early age reduces from certain disabilities. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. There should be more places where only smokers can smoke freely.
Also, businesess are not losing a little bit of money, there are bars that have been there for years all around me that are being completely shut down.
No big deal right? And in case of man, it takes 3 years off. A person who wants to smoke can do so by keeping himself in isolation. Ignorance is not bliss, so instead of continuing on your pointless rant about how "bad" smokers are, how about you accept the fact that not everyone has the same viewpoint as you do.
Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. You cannot tell who is a smoker from just looking at them unless affected greatly by smokingjust as you cannot tell who is a thief from just another customer at a store.
The hazardous effects of smoking are well known to our society, and since ages, the governments are advertising its ill-effects. Smoking is a choice via that person.
Also, there are many diseases, such as cancer and cirrhosis that can be easily developed in a living body not just in a smoker one but in the liver that is needed by the one that is smoking. Another examplethey have to avoid certain places. For exampleair pollution is one of the causes that would definitely affect the environment.
Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Smoking also causes pollution and people who smoke leave their cigarettes everywhere they can on the ground, in the grass, on the plants.
Cigarette contains 4, types of chemicals out of which 43 are carcinogenic. One of them is could be fast like lung cancer and the other type could be slow that will show up after twenty years or more. BUT if it was banned smokers could smoke in their home and cars, and harm themselves and not others.
So, the government should ban smoking at least in public places. So people should be allowed to drive for as fast as they want regardless if this can lead to car accidents which can do harms to other people.Essay on Smoking In Public Places Should Be Banned Words | 2 Pages.
Smoking In Public Places Should Be Banned There should be rules enforced for smoking in public places. Smokers just do not know the negative influence they are spreading. A puff of cigarette can harm a smokers health.
Smoking in public places, in other words, should be banned. ‘Smoke’ – the very word conjures up a foul, unhealthy, suffocating, polluted environment with dark clouds of gases suffused everywhere. However, smoking does not only affect the smoker negatively.
It also affects all the people around those who smoke because when people smoke in pubic the smoke travels everywhere through the air, and the negative effects of this smoke affects all living, breathing creatures. Therefore smoking should be banned in all public places. The introduction is clear - note how it follows the ban smoking in public places essay question - it paraphrases the information in order to introduce the topic and the argument.
The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. Smoking is bad for the ones around you. I think that smoking should be banned because I am a kid, and when I walk by a smoker I always have to cover my mouth which is quiet irritating sometimes.
Smoking in Public Places Should Be Banned I feel very strongly that smoking in public places should be banned. I will list my reasons for my thinking below and explain why I think this.
I cannot stand walking down a street behind someone who is smoking.Download